搜索此博客

显示标签为“comment”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“comment”的博文。显示所有博文

2009年1月30日星期五

Defiance: Landscape of War



The history of Belorussia in World War II is largely ignored at best. Given that, it has become so much harder to depict the story of the Bielski Partisans on the big screen. Only the fact is clear: that the Bielski brothers managed to save over 1,200 Jewish people by hiding in the Nalibocka forest from the mean war machine of the Nazis. What the Partisans did was hardly imaginable today, and may involve some extreme moral challenges that cannot be pictured without causing a emotional discomfort of the audiences.

Good for the director Edward Zwick, he did not mean to compare the Bielskis with Steven Spielberg's German [Righteous among the Nations](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righteous_Among_the_Nations) Oskar Schindler, nor did he want to produce a sentimental and moving epic as *Schindler's List*. He was very clear about the idea of the picture when he set out to make it: to tell a story about how Jewish people defy their fate of being slaughtered, not that about their being killed and rescued by Germans.

The story-telling may not be a *tour de force* like that of *Schindler's List*, nor does the film has a nemesis character like Amon Goeth, yet the viewing pleasure is not reduced. As always, Edward Zwick did not insert a stereotype evil character into his film, but throw us directly into the historical and ethnic environment of the movie's settings, and reveal layers and layers of conflicts. Again in this movie he managed to depict complex interaction between multitudes of humanity and a dramatic age full of overwhelming events, while keeping the audiences' fist clenched and them sitting at the edge of the chair.

Map of Western Belorussia

A central conflict in this movie is brought to the face of our protagonists by their very purpose: to survive and defy the fate that has descended on their nation. In the huge, all-devouring grinder of the war, to escape being victims, the only way is to become the ones who impose destruction on the enemies. This brings the fundamental conflict into play: to what extent can one gain power while sustaining empathy and humanity. All the other conflicts, such as those between Jewish combatant and non-combatant, and between Jewish and German people, are all developed around the fundamental conflict. These conflicts work as prisms, which refract multiple facets of human nature, which makes the landscape of war more alive and more realistic. The behaviours of the groups of Jew is no longer innocent or morally perfect as some other war movies depicted, but are convincing and arousing compassion.

The director has done a good job telling a story of people in desperate conditions, and was greatly helped by a group of great actors, although many of them are not famous. Although not without caveats, in most part the acting is natural and compelling. You would feel that those are really Jewish people in that time, beaten-up, self-preserving, yet willing to fight beside their charismatic leader. Being often seeing real-life Jewish people, I thought Daniel Craig was too British to act as a Jewish leader, but he really brings out the leader's spirit. Yet in some action scenes he still reminds me of Bond.

Although the story can well be adapted into a high profile action movie, or at least an epic movie with the excitement of *Last Samurai*, Zwick has chosen to reflect the day-to-day struggle and sacrifice in the forest, this may make the movie less a block buster, but surely is not a bad thing if we consider its values in preserving a piece of forgotten history. Although there are some inconsistency in the plot, and the first half was a bit slow, *Defiance* is nevertheless one of the best movies depicting the brave struggles in WWII.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

2008年1月13日星期日

No country for old men

这片子的宿命感十分强烈。所有人都在沙漠里混吃等死,还美其名曰为了生存。就连我们“正义”的两位男主角,也一个整天带着不义之财东躲西藏,一个只会在下属面前卖弄经验。相比之下,倒是人人谈之色变的杀手,活得很有目的,是个“有原则的人”。不过就连他,最后也要很宿命地遇上点劫难。这有点像银河映像的《暗花》,不同的是这部片子里根本就不存在什么幕后人物。

片子很颓废,但是观众仍然看得非常紧张。因为杀手遇到的90%的人都死了,但是观众们都很关心现在画面里这个人是否能成为幸运的10%,或者概率更小更刺激的,这个人能否在杀手面前上演一出扮猪吃老虎的好戏。然而杀手似乎并不给那个人这样的机会,他的每句话都在将面前的人逼入绝境。观众们也只好在椅子边缘屏息等待杀手出手的刹那……

这一刹那的冲击力随着凌厉的剪辑和音效体现得淋漓尽致。片子里长于10秒的镜头很少,但一旦出现一定是强调荒凉或者积蓄爆发前的张力,真正动手的一刻,猝不及防,而后镜头又立即转到下一个故事或者支线,绝无拖沓。不知道这样的剪辑是无间道在先还是科恩兄弟首创,但我看这片子时从椅子上跳起来两次,是从记事以来绝无仅有的观影经历。音效里没有明显地卖弄影院的 n.1 环回立体声,但影院里人人都可以感受到那种从正面逼近的震慑,有如子弹直击眉心。

就连影片的结尾也让人措手不及。在连串的暴力后,刚看到一点家居生活还没有回过味来,影片就结束了,留下观众在座位上发呆。是的,不如说影片没有结局。这再一次强化了影片中的宿命论观点,生活中的个人不像每一部影片中的英雄一样,都可以在紧要关头反败为胜打得坏人满地找牙抱得美人归,更多的时候人们无力反抗或者不敢反抗,只有留下无尽的悔恨和一辈子的自责。

我以堂堂七尺之躯,走在从电影院到家那段走了无数次的夜路上,第一次感到心里没底。